Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Lab Software: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:38, 30 October 2012

Revision as of 19:04, 3 November 2012

Line 8:

:<small>Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game-related deletion discussions]]. ({{find video game sources short|Flying Lab Software|linksearch=}}) [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)</small>

:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)</small>

*'''Delete'''. Here's a source review:

**[http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2008/06/pirates-of-the/ A small story in Wired] about a release of one of their games. It's about the company mostly, in the context of the game, and quotes the CEO. This is a reliable source. But it's a short story and doesn't have much material that would be of use in an article.

**[http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=15477#.UJVnjLQk9FI A podcast on Gamasutra.com], in which a couple executives are interviewed. This isn't really a secondary source, as it's an interview, and it's for the most part about a game, not the company.

**Other than that, all I can find are a variety of press releases, announcements of patches and game launches, etc. Nothing, in short, that can be considered a reliable source for the purposes of notability.

:Doesn't meet the [[WP:GNG]] or [[WP:CORPDEPTH]] requirements, unless more evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources can be found. --[[User:Batard0|Batard0]] ([[User talk:Batard0|talk]]) 19:04, 3 November 2012 (UTC)