Revision as of 00:04, 9 May 2006 edit Bishonen (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 82,117 edits →Evidence presented by [[User:Bishonen]]: Sam Spade responds to his RfC with contempt and "chastisement" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:06, 9 May 2006 edit undo Bishonen (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 82,117 edits m →Sam Spade responds to his RfC with contempt and "chastisement": grammar Next edit →
Line 91: '''From April 4 to April 14, 2006''' The criticism most often voiced at the RfC is that Sam assumes bad faith and makes ad hominem attacks. His own behavior at and during the RfC ~~illustrate~~illustrates this. I apologize for walking the ArbCom through part of an RfC that is already linked above, and I'll be as brief as possible, but it seems to me that the timeline of events of these ten days is telling, and the RfC format tends to obscure it. The following examples form a chronological narrative, although I've avoided indicating clock timestamps, as people tend to merely get confused by the timezone issues. ''April 4:'' In his response section, Sam Spade expresses disdain for the people who initiated and endorsed the RfC, referring to them as "hoodlums" and a "hydra" of troublemakers, and regretting that he doesn't have time for "the usual [sic] dirt-digging" on them.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sam_Spade&diff=46957983&oldid=46957635] [[User:Daycd]] posts a (formally incorrect) protest in Sam's section, which is quickly endorsed by many people. I post an outside view describing Sam as always impugning the motives of his opponents.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sam_Spade&diff=46994464&oldid=46993054]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sam Spade/Evidence: Difference between revisions