Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web-Developer Server Suite: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:56, 12 November 2012

Revision as of 19:07, 12 November 2012

Line 10:

==Why Delete?==

(half of this is in regards to [[Wamp-Developer Server]] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vorlion|Vorlion]] ([[User talk:Vorlion|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vorlion|contribs]]) 18:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

(half of this is in regards to [[Wamp-Developer Server]]

Please clarify your position, or suggest improvements, instead of general tags.

Line 17 ⟶ 20:

In addition -

1. You can see the website going back to 2003 on the Internet Archive - WayBackMachine (http://archive.org/web/web.php), making this WAMP one of the original 2 or 3 WAMPs (with [[XAMPP]] and [[easyPHP]]). If this is a problem - most WAMPS [[Comparison_of_WAMPs]] listed wouldn't stand up to this.

2. "combining prexisting software into a single distribution" ... this is wrong. WampDeveloper ProWamp-Developer uses it's own C# and .NET coded application and managerial framework, which sits on top of the web-server components. It's a 200,000+ line application. Not only does it provide original software, but it also manages the WAMP components completly different than from other WAMPs such as [[Xampp]]... Allowing switching between Apache, PHP, and MYSQL with 1-click and no new installs.

3. "No third party sources" ... I have listed 3rd party sources for multiple statements of fact. Can you clarify what you are looking for? You can search the internet or StackOverflow and ServerFault for mentions of "WampDeveloper" or "Wamp-Developer". There are MANY results. Also "Web Developer Server Suite" (the previous incarnation/name).

4. The page [[Wamp-Developer Server]] was created because [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] and previously [[User:Ronz|Ronz]] reduced the [[Comparison_of_WAMPs]] page of all links to entries without a Wikipedia page. These were entries of WAMPs with, in some cases, 100s of thousands of active users. Wikipedia guidelines here -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LISTN#Stand-alone_lists

... clearly state that Lists do not have to contain notable entries as long as the list (as a group of entries) is notable itself and it's not "large" (10 entries is not large, I removed 10 dead WAMPs from that list a long time ago myself, but never active projects). This produces a problem such as this. Even a catch 22 in some cases.

[[User:Vorlion|Vorlion]] ([[User talk:Vorlion|talk]]) 18:47, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Also...

Line 33 ⟶ 34:

5. This is a new page that was published days ago, is being actively changed to fit wikipdia guidelines, and has maintained the "New page" tag from inception. This type of speedy deletion submission is concidered by wikipedia guidlines to be in bad-faith, as far as I can tell.

[[User:Vorlion|Vorlion]] ([[User talk:Vorlion|talk]]) 1819:5107, 12 November 2012 (UTC)