Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web-Developer Server Suite: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:23, 12 November 2012

Revision as of 20:50, 12 November 2012

Line 43:

::::I have read that. It is a "general" guide and does not lend itself to WAMP distributions well... I have also linked to a similar page for you in my original point #4. See the link-pages here [[Comparison_of_WAMPs]] for notability "standards" for WAMPs or please be more specific. Your link also states you should add and revise, instead of delete (last-resort)). [[User:Vorlion|Vorlion]] ([[User talk:Vorlion|talk]]) 20:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

:::::It is a 'general' guide because everything should meet it. Your link to the stand alone lists guideline doesn't apply here, we are talking about the independent article you created, not a list entry. I tried to add and revise, but I could not find the required sources. As the package's author, you would be in an ideal position to provide sources, should they exist. It would be very helpful if you would do so. If you (or someone else) do not provide such sources, the article will very likely be deleted. - [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 20:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

::::::[[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] "I tried to add and revise but I could not find the required sources" Can you clarify with a specific example of the needed source/reference, and to what part of the content it needs to be applied to? It's convenient that 1) your summery states that this will be your last comment here and 2) your history (removed of spam cleaning and reverting) shows no real additions to '''anything''', all I see is red for the last 4 years that you've been here. [[User:Vorlion|Vorlion]] ([[User talk:Vorlion|talk]]) 20:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

====[[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]]====

I have looked at your history, and you are trying to delete pages in the web-development area (forum software, php frameworks, etc) that are not only notable in every point of the guidelines, but are in the top lists of their category; while at the same time, leaving lesser notable pages in place.

You're history (removed of spam cleaning and reverting) shows no real additions to '''anything''' since your first day.

You've also been intentionally general in your responses.

I don't think ''I'' or ''You'' should discuss this further as we both know there would be no point... And leave this to whoever makes the final decision. Hopefuly, it's not you! (I have no idea how the deletion process goes).

I would ASK you for 1 thing though, as outlined in my previous point #4…

Wikipedia guidelines here -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LISTN#Stand-alone_lists

... clearly state that Lists do not have to contain notable entries as long as the list (as a group of entries) is notable itself.

If these pages do get removed, I'd like to add the '''active''' non-wikipedia-paged WAMPs back. Or better yet, for you to do that.