Revision as of 18:07, 12 April 2012 edit Nageh (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,862 edits m WikiProject Cryptography assessment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:14, 13 November 2012 edit undo 108.7.229.221 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 16: From a causality point of view - RIPEMD can not be derived from RIPEMD-160, since the latter was in fact developed after the first. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.206.174.166\|91.206.174.166]] ([[User talk:91.206.174.166\|talk]]) 10:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I think the attacks on reduced step versions of RIPE and SHA1 should be listed separately in the table of best attacks. 24 step SHA1 is NOT SHA1 and the strength of 24 step SHA1 is not something that many readers are going to be able to use as an indicator of the strength of actual SHA1. [[Special:Contributions/108.7.229.221\|108.7.229.221]] ([[User talk:108.7.229.221\|talk]]) 21:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of cryptographic hash functions: Difference between revisions