Revision as of 18:48, 13 February 2011 edit Scottinthebox (talk \| contribs) 19 edits Added agreement to the original statement ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:02, 14 November 2012 edit undo H Padleckas (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 5,975 edits m →Merging Process simulation into Chemical process modeling: fixed to more appropriate link Next edit →
Line 3: == Merging [[Process simulation]] into [[Chemical process modeling]] == It seems the [[Process simulation]] article is mostly about chemical processes. For some reason, [[Process ~~design~~Design]] redirects to [[Process simulation]], even though there is a separate [[Process design (chemical engineering)]] article. Does anybody have any thoughts on this matter? [[User:H Padleckas\|H Padleckas]] ([[User talk:H Padleckas\|talk]]) 22:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Looking at the two articles I agree that they should be merged. In my experience the technology is usually referred to as process simulation hence [[Chemical process modeling]] is best merged into [[Process simulation]]. If anyone felt inclined an article on Dynamic Process Simulation should be developed as it is a area of expertise in its own right. [[User:Scottinthebox\|Scottinthebox]] ([[User talk:Scottinthebox\|talk]]) 18:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Chemical process modeling: Difference between revisions