Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
organisation, sigs |
||
Line 1:
{{CryptographyProject|class=List|importance=Low}}
== Patent information ==
It would be very interesting if someone would take the time to gather license/patent information about the algorithms :)▼
-LM <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/213.100.57.46|213.100.57.46]] ([[User talk:213.100.57.46|talk]]) 18:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP -->
== Updating related pages ==
I'm curious if there is some way to either split a few pages or some method to keep pages with the same content up to date. For instance there is at least:
Cryptographic_hash_function
Line 9 ⟶ 14:
[[User:Quelrod|Quelrod]] ([[User talk:Quelrod|talk]]) 18:24, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
== Reduced round versions ==
▲It would be very interesting if someone would take the time to gather license/patent information about the algorithms :)
Putting attack on the complete algorithm and attack on reduced rounds versions in the same table is completely unreadable, mixing practical weaknesses and irrelevant to practical security ones... <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JidGom|JidGom]] ([[User talk:JidGom|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JidGom|contribs]]) 11:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->▼
▲Putting attack on the complete algorithm and attack on reduced rounds versions in the same table is completely unreadable, mixing practical weaknesses and irrelevant to practical security ones...
:I think the attacks on reduced step versions of RIPE and SHA1 should be listed separately in the table of best attacks. 24 step SHA1 is NOT SHA1 and the strength of 24 step SHA1 is not something that many readers are going to be able to use as an indicator of the strength of actual SHA1. [[Special:Contributions/108.7.229.221|108.7.229.221]] ([[User talk:108.7.229.221|talk]]) 21:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)▼
== RIPEMD ==
From a causality point of view - RIPEMD can not be derived from RIPEMD-160, since the latter was in fact developed after the first. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.206.174.166|91.206.174.166]] ([[User talk:91.206.174.166|talk]]) 10:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
▲I think the attacks on reduced step versions of RIPE and SHA1 should be listed separately in the table of best attacks. 24 step SHA1 is NOT SHA1 and the strength of 24 step SHA1 is not something that many readers are going to be able to use as an indicator of the strength of actual SHA1. [[Special:Contributions/108.7.229.221|108.7.229.221]] ([[User talk:108.7.229.221|talk]]) 21:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
| |||