Paraxial approximation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
ZéroBot (talk | contribs)
m r2.7.1) (Robot: Adding eu:Optika paraxial
m Removed "citation needed" tag from statement about accuracy. Citations should not be needed for mathematical facts.
Line 16:
:<math> \cos \theta \approx 1 - { \theta^2 \over 2 } \ .</math>
 
The paraxial approximation is accurate within 0.5% for angles under about 10°{{Citation needed|date=May 2011}} but its inaccuracy grows significantly for larger angles.
 
For larger angles it is often necessary to distinguish between [[meridional ray]]s, which lie in a plane containing the [[optical axis]], and [[sagittal ray]]s, which do not.