Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2012/Candidates/Carcharoth/Questions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) →Questions from Cunard: on recusals |
Carcharoth (talk | contribs) →Questions from Cunard: skip consensus questions and leave notes |
||
Line 160:
; {{anchor|Consensus}} Consensus
<table class="shortcutbox noprint" style="float: right; border: 1px solid #aaa; background: #fff; margin: .3em .3em .3em 1em; padding: 3px; text-align: center;"><tr><th style="border: none; background: transparent;" class="plainlist"><small>[[Help:Link#Section linking (anchors)|Anchor]]:<ul><li>[[#Consensus]]</small></li></ul></table>
:<small>'''Note''': due to time considerations, I am skipping this set of questions. Also, I am not very active at XfD discussions and closures (that is putting it mildly!), so that factors into my decision to skip this section. If anyone particularly wants me to answer these questions, please let me know. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 14:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
# How would you have closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Kelley]]?<p>If you have a strong opinion about the topic and would have recused from closing the discussion, how would you have voted?
# After considering [[Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough consensus]], would you vote to endorse, overturn, or relist the "delete" close at the deletion review [[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 November 21#Jill Kelley]]?
Line 168 ⟶ 169:
# When closing an XfD or RfC, how would the number of votes for a position factor into your decision? Suppose the vote count for a non-policy-based position is significantly higher than for a policy-based position (perhaps 80% vs. 20%). Further suppose that there is substantial participation and that all of the participants are experienced editors in good-standing. Do you close as consensus in favor of the non-policy-based position, consensus in favor of the policy-based position, or no consensus? Feel free to speak generally or to use the the AfD mentioned in #1 if it is applicable.
# Regarding the previous question: Does the community collectively determine what the policy-based position is through their discussion at the XfD or RfC? Should the closing admin be tasked with determining the policy-based position? Or should there be a balance of the two?
#*<small>See the note at the top of this section about skipping these questions. [[User:Carcharoth|Carcharoth]] ([[User talk:Carcharoth|talk]]) 14:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
; {{anchor|Desysopping}} Desysopping
| |||