Content deleted Content added
Line 115:
Can you please leave your favouritism towards C# alone and please just provide useful information for readers. I am sure it is in the interests of the readers to know that C# does not run on those operating systems without additional third-pary software. [[User:Kupraios|Kupraios]] ([[User talk:Kupraios|talk]]) 04:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
:Is Java on Android supplied/supported by Oracle? No! Oracle actually ''sued'' over that. I am sure it is in the interests of the readers to know that Java does not run on that operating system without additional (and controversial) third-party (Google Dalvik) software. See how that argument can be used against Java as well?. I ask just that you use the same standard and don't use loaded phrases ("but" is a loaded word implying a reservation - ''your'' personal reservation, not a reservation that should be put forward in the voice of WP). Please also keep in mind that these are the ''programming languages'' and '''not''' the ''platforms'' (Java and .NET). The "platform support" section is already a stretch in that regard, but if it has to mean anything in an article about the ''programming languages'' it must be that you can use the language to code for the platform. That's why Android has a "yes". Just use the same standard for C#. If you believe that the way through which a platform is supported is important then put it in a note - like <nowiki>{{yes}}<ref>through Mono</ref> and {{yes}}<ref>through Dalvik</ref></nowiki> - or something to that effect (with links). That way WP does not make judgement calls but allows the reader to come to his/her own conclusions. [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 11:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
| |||