Content deleted Content added
Line 119:
::Then change the column value for Android support on Java. I don't oppose doing so whatsoever, I just am not aware of Java support on Android. You seem to assume that I am pro-Java and am attempting to attack C#, but I actually prefer to use C# over Java, so your argument is unfounded. If the word "but" bothers you then "using" may be used, thus it may read: "Yes, using third-party software". You seem to be offended at the fact that these languages require third-party software to run on other platforms and are attempting to hide this fact, but this information is useful to the reader and is very relevant to the topic of platform support. [[User:Kupraios|Kupraios]] ([[User talk:Kupraios|talk]]) 17:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
:::[[WP:AGF]]. I reverted your edit and in the very summary I pointed out how it would be unbalanced to not use the same standard for Java. ''You'' were actually the one accusing me of favoritism towards C#, so let's not go there. And yes, I do have a problem with "but" because it is a value judgement. Some may even believe that it is a "good thing" that it's 3rd party support. Rather than saying "3rd party" why not just point out ''how'' in a ref? For the record, I do believe that the entire section is problematic because you can always find some way to use a programming language for a given platform through cross compilation. It is meaningless when comparing ''languages''. It was put there by someone who mistook language for platform. I would prefer we just delete the section. [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 18:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
| |||