Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plank cricket: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 22:
*'''Delete''', if there aren't any sources then [[WP:V|we don't write about it]], period. — [[User:Haeleth|Haeleth]] <small>[[User_talk:Haeleth|Talk]]</small> 15:14, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - And ignore all of these anons saying that verifiable sourcing doesn't matter, because it most certainly [[WP:V|does]]. --[[User:Cyde|<font color="#0055aa"><span style="cursor: w-resize">'''Cyde Weys'''</span></font>]] 16:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - This is a genuine article. Poor kids in cities don't have access to proper cricket, and this is the only way they learn - therefore the content of the article is important. Plank cricket is not written about on the internet because deprived 10-year-olds don't 'blog' about it, and probably don't even have the internet. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist - it matters hugely to a lot of people, and plays an important part in the development of cricketing skills. If the general feeling is that a separate article is too much, then it should be merged with [[street cricket]], but certainly not deleted, as the information is 100% correct, and it is a well-written piece.
| |||