Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here (0th nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
vote: BJAODN |
VeryVerily (talk | contribs) ridiculous |
||
Line 10:
*Keep, for amusement if nothing else. -[[User:Gtrmp|Sean Curtin]] 09:31, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. This has already been through the wringer about a year ago. Looks like I need to get busy on [[because]]. [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] 11:37, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
**This is ridiculous. We don't have articles on just ''words'', except those notable ''as'' words (mostly swear words). You'd better get to work on [[during]], [[although]], [[whenever]], [[anyway]], [[in case of]], [[without]], and [[notwithstanding]]. [[User:VeryVerily|V]][[User talk:VeryVerily|<font color=green>V</font>]] 22:21, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
*Keep. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 15:21, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
*Delete. A small part of the article defines "here." The rest is just a few references to the word. If I had more votes, I'd vote delete twice more just to counter the "amusement" vote and the "HHGTTG" vote. -- [[User:WOT|WOT]] 19:02, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
|