Content deleted Content added
Bigpinksocks (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 4:
Agreed, I believe that they should be merged. It would also be nice if a reference to Black Sunday 2001 would lead to this article. [[User:Str8lazy|Str8lazy]] ([[User talk:Str8lazy|talk]]) 23:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
==NPOV dispute - Technical issues==
I'm disputing the neutrality of this section due weasel words, and the following passages:<br />
"In theory the system was an ideal solution" Ideal how, and in in whose opinion?<br />
"In some cases, '''fraudulent''' cloning has been used..." This references a non-existing article and gives no explanation of what makes the cloning ''fraudulent''.<br />
Also:<br />
"A scheme ... has been widely promoted by some '''unscrupulous''' individuals as a means of disabling communication of billing information for pay-per-view programming but this device is '''effectively worthless'''..."<br />
I see no reason why the unnamed individuals should be described as ''unscrupulous'', or why the described device should be labeled as ''effectively worthless'', except for the author to express value judgements. I recommend identifying the individuals referred to, refrain from describing them as unscrupulous, and factually describing the technical shortcomings of the device.[[User:Bigpinksocks|Bigpinksocks]] ([[User talk:Bigpinksocks|talk]]) 16:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
| |||