Content deleted Content added
Adding RFC ID. |
Mark viking (talk | contribs) →External links to vendors: Comment for RfC; suggest a separate page |
||
Line 77:
Is a long list of software vendors acceptable in the external links section? Requesting input from other editors since [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finite-difference_time-domain_method&diff=527944675&oldid=527909001 the list] has been restored. '''[[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#fafad2;color:#C08000">Spinning</font>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<font style="color:#4840a0">Spark'''</font>]]''' 06:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I agree that the list violates the [[WP:NOTDIR]] policy. But I am personally not bothered by a long list at the end; it doesn't really interrupt the flow of the article. It is a list of FDTD software packages; the best solution may be to put the list into its own page and refer to it in the [[Finite-difference time-___domain method#See Also|See Also]] section. For example, the long [[List of finite element software packages]] is separate from the [[Finite element method]] page. A separate list page would allow the development of descriptions and comparisons of the packages, which could be invaluable to those who want to implement FDTD methods. [[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 13:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
|