Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:32, 13 October 2012

Revision as of 01:52, 16 December 2012

Line 30:

<li>[[Conflict resolution]] – Settling disputes between parties with apparently incompatible objectives</li>

</ul>

<br>

The applications of PROMETHEE & GAIA to complex multi-criteria decision scenarios have numbered in the thousands, and have produced extensive results in problems involving planning, resource allocation, priority setting, and selection among alternatives. Other areas have included forecasting, talent selection, and tender analysis.

<br>

Line 48 ⟶ 40:

<li>Selecting new route for train performance ([[Italferr]])[See more in External Links]</li>

</ul>

<br>

== The mathematical model ==

Line 74 ⟶ 62:

\end{array}

</math>

<br>

=== Pairwise comparisons ===

Line 209 ⟶ 193:

== PROMETHEE rankings ==

=== PROMETHEEPromethee I ===

PROMETHEE I is a partial ranking of the actions. It is based on the positive and negative flows. It includes preferences, indifferences and incomparabilities (partial preorder).

=== PROMETHEEPromethee II ===

PROMETHEE II is a complete ranking of the actions. It is based on the multicriteria net flow. It includes preferences and indifferences (preorder).