Content deleted Content added
Hervegirod (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 107:
:I still think performance would be an aspect readers would find relevant. I agree that the section as it stands now is misleading. We could remove it, but we could also try to work in the caveats you mention. Would you care to try? [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 11:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
:: The only implementation where its allowed to benchmark results for C# is Mono. Yet C# is shown supported on a variety of platforms in this article because of Mono. Plus the paragraph (at least now) shows clearly that the comparison is made with Mono. I don't know why it should be removed. [[User:Hervegirod|Hervegirod]] ([[User talk:Hervegirod|talk]]) 09:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
:::As I wrote, I absolutely believe the issue is relevant. There are some (very) old perf tests showing that .NET is faster than Java on Windows. They are dated and are probably not representative of the current state, and I'm not comfortable mentioning that in the paragraph. I would prefer that the article explain that there very well could be differences between the 1st party implementation and Mono but that there's no comparison data available because of the licensing terms. [[User:Useerup|Useerup]] ([[User talk:Useerup|talk]]) 12:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
== Page Is Irrelevent ==
| |||