Content deleted Content added
Deltahedron (talk | contribs) Contested PROD explanation |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damm algorithm closed as keep |
||
Line 1:
{{oldafdfull| date = 22 December 2012 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Damm algorithm }}
==Contested PROD==
This article was proposed for deletion with rationale ''This article presents [[WP:OR|original research]], which is not permitted by our policies. Unless you can add [[WP:RS|reliable]] and independent [[WP:V|sources]], which attest to the subject's [[WP:N|notability]], your article will be deleted. Thank you for your understanding.'' This seems wrong and I have contested the PROD since the article does indeed cite reliable sources, namely a peer-reviewed academic journal, and our policy on [[WP:OR|original research]] is a prohibition on editors directly publishing their own unsupported work in an article -- it does not mean that we cannot report research published in independent reliable sources, which this appears to do. [[User:Deltahedron|Deltahedron]] ([[User talk:Deltahedron|talk]]) 07:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
| |||