Revision as of 15:15, 9 January 2013 edit Walter Görlitz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 294,571 edits →The V-Model "in its simple and commonly understood form": you can't throw variants on in the section unless it's been described ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:20, 9 January 2013 edit undo Walter Görlitz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 294,571 edits →The V-Model "in its simple and commonly understood form": secondary point Next edit →
Line 49: [[User:Freddie Threepwood\|Freddie Threepwood]] ([[User talk:Freddie Threepwood\|talk]]) 11:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC) : An anon has started to restore material, but the phrase is redundant but nowhere does the article explain that it has variants. It only explains that it is one, single process. --[[User:Walter Görlitz\|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz\|talk]]) 15:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC) : Also, I've never heard that there are multiple forms so until you provide some reliable source to support your claim it makes no sense to include the phrase. --[[User:Walter Görlitz\|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz\|talk]]) 15:20, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Talk:V-model (software development): Difference between revisions