Content deleted Content added
Line 77:
: Also, don't worry about taking the article over, I don't see it that way. It seems more as though you understand the subject and enjoy writing. That makes you an ideal editor. In that light, [[:WP:BOLD|make whatever changes you feel are necessary]]. --[[User:Walter Görlitz|Walter Görlitz]] ([[User talk:Walter Görlitz|talk]]) 15:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for this. Yes, I'll do something, but I'm too busy right now. I don't think merging the articles is the right way though. I think it's worth retaining two in the short term; one for the formal German V-Modell, the US government version and the detailed lifecycle version (Forsberg & Mooz), and a second (ie this one) for the more informal software testers' depiction of the lifecycle.
In the longer term the former article should be broken out into its three constituent parts. Otherwise explanations can get hopelessly confused when one is dealing with things that look superficially similar but are really fundamentally different with quite distinct uses. [[User:Freddie Threepwood|Freddie Threepwood]] ([[User talk:Freddie Threepwood|talk]]) 13:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC) |