Revision as of 15:10, 9 January 2013 edit EmilJ (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 11,141 edits →Injective function ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:46, 17 January 2013 edit undo RandomDSdevel (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 762 edits →Suggestion to Solve Problems Readers Might Have Reading the 'Functions' Section of this Article: new section Next edit →
Line 55: Am I missing something? This condition does not seem to restrict the function f in any way. (f(x)=0 would meet the definition, if 0 is an element of B.) - [[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] ([[User talk:Mike Rosoft\|talk]]) 19:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC) :This is a mistake.—[[User:EmilJ\|Emil]] [[User talk:EmilJ\|J.]] 15:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC) == Suggestion to Solve Problems Readers Might Have Reading the 'Functions' Section of this Article == Can I suggest that the 'Functions' section of this article be reformulated to take advantage of the fact that a lot of the logical statements which reside inside refer to a requirement of function transitivity and that transitive relativity was already defined in the previous section on relations? I think that this change will make the article a ''lot'' easier to read. [[User:BCG999\|BCG999]] ([[User talk:BCG999\|talk]]) 20:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Implementation of mathematics in set theory: Difference between revisions