Implementation of mathematics in set theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Properties and kinds of relations: The condition for reflexivity was wrong, and I think it is more comprehensible in words anyway.
m Properties and kinds of relations: avoid “if and only if” in definitions per MOS:MATH
Line 76:
=== Properties and kinds of relations ===
Let ''R'' be some [[binary relation]]. ''R'' is:
*'''[[Reflexive relation|Reflexive]]''' if ''xRx'' for every ''x'' in the ___domain or rangefield of ''R''.
 
* '''[[Symmetric relation|Symmetric]]''' if <math>\forall x,y \,(xRy \to yRx)</math>.
Line 90:
Relations having certain combinations of the above properties have standard names. ''R'' is:
 
* An '''[[equivalence relation]]''' [[if and only if]] ''R'' is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
 
* A '''[[partial order]]''' if and only if ''R'' is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive.
 
* A '''[[linear order]]''' if and only if ''R'' is a partial order and for every ''x,y'' in the field of ''R'', either ''xRy'' or ''yRx''.
 
* A '''[[well-ordering]]''' if and only if ''R'' is a linear order and well-founded.
 
* A '''set picture''' if and only if ''R'' is well-founded and extensional, and the field of ''R'' either equals the downward closure of one of its members (called its ''top element''), or is empty.
 
== Functions ==