Fifth-generation programming language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 88.96.25.14 to version by Tim Ivorson. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1351906) (Bot)
{{when}}
Line 10:
However, as larger programs were built, the flaws of the approach became more apparent. It turns out that starting from a set of constraints defining a particular problem, deriving an efficient algorithm to solve it is a very difficult problem in itself. This crucial step cannot yet be automated and still requires the insight of a human programmer.
 
Today,{{when}} fifth-generation languages are back as a possible level of computer language. A number{{Who|date=August 2010}} of software vendors currently claim that their software meets the visual "programming" requirements of the 5GL concept.
 
==Common misconception==