Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Language Learning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:18, 29 January 2013

Revision as of 05:40, 30 January 2013

Line 12:

*'''Delete''' - Company is not notable enough to have its own article within WP. <b style="background:#FEE;padding:5px;font-size:10px">[[User:Eduemoni|<b style="color:#913">Ed</b><b style="color:#C13">ue</b><b style="color:#D35">mo</b><b style="color:#E57">ni</b>]][[User Talk:Eduemoni|<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓</sup>]]</b> 14:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

*:Not that I disagree with you or anything, but you should probably have a look at [[WP:ITSNOTABLE]], as arguments like the above aren't usually given too much weight by the closing admin. Best — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' ^{[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]} 14:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

**Ok, lemme rephrase it, I put the right argumentation under Englishpod101 (or whatsoever) - '''Delete''' - This company and its roost of softwares are not notable, with the sole exception of the Japanesepod101, there are few reviews from few unreliable or self-published sources, only mentions or whatsoever. <b style="background:#FEE;padding:5px;font-size:10px">[[User:Eduemoni|<b style="color:#913">Ed</b><b style="color:#C13">ue</b><b style="color:#D35">mo</b><b style="color:#E57">ni</b>]][[User Talk:Eduemoni|<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓</sup>]]</b> 14:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)