Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Language Learning: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Relisting debate
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 
:{{la|Innovative Language Learning}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Language Learning|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 2331#{{anchorencode:Innovative Language Learning}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Innovative_Language_Learning Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Innovative Language Learning}})
While one of their podcasts, [[Japanesepod101]], is notable, this company doesn't seem to pass [[WP:CORP]]. The only discussion I can see in the article's references is of Japanesepod101, not about the company itself, and the company doesn't automatically inherit notability from the product. I didn't find any other sources online. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius on tour|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius on tour</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius on tour|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 05:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Line 13:
*:Not that I disagree with you or anything, but you should probably have a look at [[WP:ITSNOTABLE]], as arguments like the above aren't usually given too much weight by the closing admin. Best — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 14:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
**Ok, lemme rephrase it, I put the right argumentation under Englishpod101 (or whatsoever) - '''Delete''' - This company and its roost of softwares are not notable, with the sole exception of the Japanesepod101, there are few reviews from few unreliable or self-published sources, only mentions or whatsoever. <b style="background:#FEE;padding:5px;font-size:10px">[[User:Eduemoni|<b style="color:#913">Ed</b><b style="color:#C13">ue</b><b style="color:#D35">mo</b><b style="color:#E57">ni</b>]][[User Talk:Eduemoni|<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓</sup>]]</b> 14:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:KTC|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC|talk]]) 00:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />