Revision as of 00:13, 31 January 2013 edit KTC (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 23,887 edits Relisting debate ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:58, 31 January 2013 edit undo Razr nation old (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 1,330 edits →Innovative Language Learning Next edit →
Line 17: :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:KTC\|KTC]] ([[User talk:KTC\|talk]]) 00:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates\|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] <hr style="width:55%;" /> *'''Delete''' The websites this company controls may be notable by themselves, but notability is not inherited upwards or downwards. Only musical artists receive notability because of their singles or albums, as well as several other few things. The rest, and specially organizations, have to meet, by themselves, the notability guideline by being covered on a non-trivial fashion by third party independent sources, and I am not seeing that to be successfully met in this case. — [[User:Razr Nation\|<font color="#336699">'''''Ṙ'''''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21\|<font color="#333333">'''Λ'''</font>]] 01:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Language Learning: Difference between revisions