Talk:Ada (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Move list of future topics from main page. Ask about Steelman
m Automated conversion
Line 1:
<b>Moved comments here from main text. Reorganized into threads.</b>--[[:buzco|buzco]]
----
Really only used anymore in US Department of Defense stuff. Oh yeah, and Ada95, the most popular Ada compiler actually translates your code to C, then compiles the C. I love that.
Line 9:
:Do you mean GNAT (GNU Ada Translater) when writing "Ada95"? This is no translater to C any longer but a frontend to the GNU Compiler Collection, as the C or the Java frontends are. By the way, it is _not_ used only by DOD staff and it is a highly capable language. In contrast to the popular misbelief it produces rather fast code (comparable to C).
:----
:Make that C, C++, Forth, FORTRAN, Java, Objective C and Pascal front ends! May be others! --[[:buzco|buzco]]
:----
:The team behind Gnat used in the beginning a proprietary Ada compiler and used that to build an compiler which implemented a subset of Ada big enough to support building itself. Now the team left that proprietary compiler in the dust. After that it was a simple matter of extending that they already have while using the base to build the next more evolved version.
Line 21:
Should there be a section on primary users of a language like ada and how their requirements affected the language?
----
Ada has some tastes of Pascal still but not one of the bad ones. --[[:Janet Davis|Janet Davis]]
----
(list of possible topics moved from main page)