Revision as of 16:51, 3 February 2013 edit Biscuittin (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 69,374 edits links ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:42, 4 February 2013 edit undo Chris the speller (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 894,226 edits m →Motivation: per WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, points 3,4,5, replaced: critically- → critically, typos fixed: ie., → i.e., using AWB (8853) Next edit →
Line 5: ==Motivation== The motivation for a no-license approach varies widely, but is perhaps primarily on account of the overheads involved in maintaining the permission/license regime. It is notable that the well-known Free Culture activist, [[Nina Paley]] released her critically- acclaimed film, "Sita Sings the Blues" in a CC0 license (iei.e., placed it in public ___domain) in January 2013 <ref>http://blog.ninapaley.com/2013/01/18/ahimsa-sita-sings-the-blues-now-cc-0-public-___domain/</ref>. ==References==

Post open source: Difference between revisions