Revision as of 14:42, 4 February 2013 edit Chris the speller (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 894,226 edits m →Motivation: per WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, points 3,4,5, replaced: critically- → critically, typos fixed: ie., → i.e., using AWB (8853) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:18, 6 February 2013 edit undo Rfontana (talk \| contribs) 196 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 2: ==History== "POSS" was first used by James Governor, founder of analyst firm RedMonk, who reportedly said <ref>https://twitter.com/monkchips/status/247584170967175169</ref> "Younger devs today are about POSS -- Post open source software. F*** the license and governance, just commit to github".<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/github-needs-take-open-source-seriously-208046\|title=GitHub needs to take open source seriously\|author=Simon Phipps\|publisher=Infoworld\|date=30 November 2012\|accessdate=30 January 2013}}</ref> According to ~~Louis~~Luis Villa, when even "...the open license ecosystem assumes that sharing can't (or even shouldn't) happen without explicit permission in the form of licenses", developers vote their dissent through POSS <ref>http://tieguy.org/blog/2013/01/27/taking-post-open-source-seriously-as-a-statement-about-copyright-law/</ref>. ==Motivation==

Post open source: Difference between revisions