Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 36:
The article begins, "In Computer Science...". Doesn't this seem a bit pretentious and misleading? Floyd-Warshall's Algorithm has many different and unique applications, and it is certainly neither confined to the field of computer science nor dependent on computer science. If such a presumptive lead-in is to be used--I don't see a need for such a one, in my opinion it's unnecessary--then the most generalized, pure categorization should be used, e.g. "In Graph Theory..." or, "In Mathematics...". Cheers. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.12.211.253|71.12.211.253]] ([[User talk:71.12.211.253|talk]]) 21:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: It's standard for Mathematics and Computer Science articles to begin with "In <field of study>...". And this article is about an algorithm! The algorithm computes the length of the shortest path between any two vertices, but I don't think that beginning the article with "in graph theory" would be more accurate. <span class="nowrap"><b>[[User:Justin W Smith|Justin W Smith]]</b> <i><sup>[[User talk:Justin W Smith|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Justin W Smith|stalk]]</sub></i></span> 03:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
== Optimization in Pseudocode ==
I've removed the optimization from the pseudocode. The point of pseudocode is not to show the most efficient method possible, but rather to illustrate how the algorithm works. [[User:Stargazer7121|Stargazer7121]] ([[User talk:Stargazer7121|talk]]) 21:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
| |||