Framing (scienze sociali): differenze tra le versioni

Versione delle 19:26, 5 set 2012

Versione delle 19:32, 8 nov 2012

Riga 92:

== Bibliografia ==

* Baars, B. (1988), ''A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness'', Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

* Boulding, Kenneth E. (1956). ''The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society.'', Michigan University Press.

* Carruthers, P. (2003), On Fodor's Problem, Mind and Language, vol. 18(5), pp. 502–523.

* Clark, A. (1997), ''Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Cutting, Hunter and Makani Themba Nixon (2006). ''Talking the Walk: A Communications Guide for Racial Justice:'', AK Press

* Dennett, D. (1978), ''Brainstorms'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Fairhurst, Gail T. and Sarr, Robert A. 1996. ''The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership.'' USA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

* Feldman, Jeffrey. (2007), ''Framing the Debate: Famous Presidential Speeches and How Progressives Can Use Them to Control the Conversation (and Win Elections)''. Brooklyn, NY: Ig Publishing.

* Fodor, J.A. (1983), The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Fodor, J.A. (19871983), “Modules,''The Frames,Modularity Fridgeons,of Sleeping DogsMind'', and the Music of the Spheres”Cambridge, inMA: PylyshynMIT (1987)Press.

* Fodor, J.A. (20001987), The Mind Doesn't'Modules, WorkFrames, ThatFridgeons, WaySleeping Dogs, Cambridgeand the Music of the Spheres'', MA:in MITPylyshyn Press(1987).

* FordFodor, K.M. & Hayes, P.J. (edsA.) (19912000), Reasoning''The AgentsMind inDoesn't aWork DynamicThat World:Way'', The Frame ProblemCambridge, New YorkMA: JAIMIT Press.

* Ford, K.M. & Hayes, P.J. (eds.) (1991), ''Reasoning Agents in a Dynamic World: The Frame Problem'', New York: JAI Press.

* Goodman, N. (1954), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

* Goffman, Erving. 1974. ''Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.'' London: Harper and Row. (tr. it. (2001), ''Frame analysis. L'organizzazione dell'esperienza'', ed. Armando. ISBN 88-8358-233-0)

* Hanks, S. & McDermott, D. (1987), “Nonmonotonic Logic and Temporal Projection”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33(3), pp. 379–412.

* Goffman, E. (1959). ''Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.'', New York: Doubleday. (tr. it. ''La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione'', Il Mulino)

* Haselager, W.F.G. (1997). Cognitive science and folk psychology: the right frame of mind. London: Sage

* Goodman, N. (1954), ''Fact, Fiction, and Forecast'', Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

* Haselager, W.F.G. & Van Rappard, J.F.H. (1998), “Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem”, Minds and Machines, vol. 8(2), pp. 161–179.

* Hanks, S. & McDermott, D. (1987), “Nonmonotonic''Nonmonotonic Logic and Temporal Projection”Projection'', Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33(3), pp. 379–412.

* Hayes, P.J. (1991), “Artificial Intelligence Meets David Hume: A Reply to Fetzer”, in Ford & Hayes (1991).

* Haselager, W.F.G. (1997). ''Cognitive science and folk psychology: the right frame of mind''. London: Sage

* Heal, J. (1996), “Simulation, Theory, and Content”, in Theories of Theories of Mind, eds. P. Carruthers & P. Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–89.

* Haselager, W.F.G. & Van Rappard, J.F.H. (1998), “Connectionism''Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem”Problem'', Minds and Machines, vol. 8(2), pp. 161–179.

* Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

* Hayes, P.J. (1991), “Artificial''Artificial Intelligence Meets David Hume: A Reply to Fetzer”Fetzer'', in Ford & Hayes (1991).

* McCarthy, J. (1986), “Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Common Sense Knowledge”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26(3), pp. 89–116.

* McCarthyHeal, J. & Hayes, P.J. (19691996), “Some''Simulation, PhilosophicalTheory, Problemsand fromContent'', thein StandpointTheories of ArtificialTheories Intelligence”, in Machine Intelligenceof 4Mind, ededs. DP.Michie andCarruthers B& P.Meltzer Smith, EdinburghCambridge: EdinburghCambridge University Press, pp. 463–50275–89.

* Johnson-Cartee, K. (2005)., ''News narrative and news framing: Constructing political reality.'', Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

* McDermott, D. (1987), “We've Been Framed: Or Why AI Is Innocent of the Frame Problem”, in Pylyshyn (1987).

* Mithen, S. (1987), The Prehistory of the Mind, London: Thames & Hudson.

* Pylyshyn, Z.W. (ed.) (1987), The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

*

* Russell, S. & Wefald, E. (1991), Do the Right Thing: Studies in Limited Rationality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Shanahan, M.P. (1997), Solving the Frame Problem: A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of Inertia, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Shanahan, M.P. (2003), “The Frame Problem”, in The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. L.Nadel, Macmillan, pp. 144–150.

* Simon, H. (1957), Models of Man, New York: John Wiley.

* Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1996), “Fodor's Frame Problem and Relevance Theory”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 19(3), pp. 530–532.

* Wilkerson, W.S. (2001), “Simulation, Theory, and the Frame Problem”, Philosophical Psychology, vol. 14(2), pp. 141–153.

*Goffman, Erving. 1974. ''Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.'' London: Harper and Row.

*Fairhurst, Gail T. and Sarr, Robert A. 1996. ''The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership.'' USA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

*Klandermans, Bert. 1997. ''The Social Psychology of Protest.'' Oxford: Blackwell.

*[[Scheufele]], Dietram A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. ''Journal of Communication, 49''(1), 103–122.

*Willard,Charles Arthur ''Liberalism and the Social Grounds of Knowledge'' Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

* Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

* Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

* Johnson-Cartee, K. (2005). News narrative and news framing: Constructing political reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

*[[Diana Kendall]], ''Sociology In Our Times'', Thomson Wadsworth, 2005, ISBN 0-534-64629-8 [http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0534646298&id=kzU-gtx2VfoC&pg=PA531&lpg=PA531&dq=%22Resource+Mobilization%22&sig=NgTePMtdl2stO7V2FofPqeZuP5I&hl=en Google Print, p.531]

*Klandermans, Bert. 1997. ''The Social Psychology of Protest.'' Oxford: Blackwell.

* Leites, N. & Wolf, C., Jr. (1970). Rebellion and authority. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.

* Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980), ''Metaphors We Live By'', Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

* Leites, N. & Wolf, C., Jr. (1970). ''Rebellion and authority''. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.

* McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes—Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements; Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (pp. 1–20). New York: Cambridge University Press.

* Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). ''Toward a psychology of framing effects''. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.

* McCarthy, J. (1986), “Applications''Applications of Circumscription to Formalizing Common Sense Knowledge”Knowledge'', Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26(3), pp. 89–116.

* Pan. Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, (pp. 35–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

* McCarthy, J. & Hayes, P.J. (1969), ''Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence'', in Machine Intelligence 4, ed. D.Michie and B.Meltzer, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 463–502.

* Romania, V. (2008). Le cornici dell'interazione, Napoli: Liguori.

* McDermott, D. (1987), “We''We've Been Framed: Or Why AI Is Innocent of the Frame Problem”Problem'', in Pylyshyn (1987).

* Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.

* Mithen, S. (1987), ''The Prehistory of the Mind'', London: Thames & Hudson.

* Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.

* Pan. Z. & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). ''Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation''. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, (pp. 35–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

* [[Sidney Tarrow|Tarrow, S.]] (1983a). Struggling to Reform: social Movements and policy change during cycles of protest. Western Societies Paper No. 15. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

* Pylyshyn, Z.W. (ed.) (1987), ''The Robot's Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence'', Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

* Tarrow, S. (1983b). Resource mobilization and cycles of protest: Theoretical reflections and comparative illustrations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Detroit, August 31–September 4.

* Romania, V. (2008). ''Le cornici dell'interazione'', Napoli: Liguori.

* Tilly, C., Tilly, L., & Tilly, R. (1975). The rebellious century, 1830–1930. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

* Russell, S. & Wefald, E. (1991), ''Do the Right Thing: Studies in Limited Rationality'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1972). Collective Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

*[[Scheufele]], Dietram A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. ''Journal of Communication, 49''(1), 103–122.

* Goffman, Erving (2001), Frame analysis. L'organizzazione dell'esperienza, ed. Armando. ISBN 88-8358-233-0

* Shanahan, M.P. (1997), ''Solving the Frame Problem: A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of Inertia'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

* Shanahan, M.P. (2003), “The''The Frame Problem”Problem'', in The Macmillan Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. L.Nadel, Macmillan, pp. 144–150.

* Simon, H. (1957), ''Models of Man'', New York: John Wiley.

* Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). ''Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization''. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.

* Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). ''Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation''. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.

* Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1996), “Fodor''Fodor's Frame Problem and Relevance Theory”Theory'', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 19(3), pp. 530–532.

* [[Sidney Tarrow|Tarrow, S.]] (1983a). ''Struggling to Reform: social Movements and policy change during cycles of protest''. Western Societies Paper No. 15. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

* Tarrow, S. (1983b). ''Resource mobilization and cycles of protest: Theoretical reflections and comparative illustrations''. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Detroit, August 31–September 4.

* Tilly, C., Tilly, L., & Tilly, R. (1975). ''The rebellious century, 1830–1930''. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

* Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1972). ''Collective Behavior''. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

* Wilkerson, W.S. (2001), “Simulation''Simulation, Theory, and the Frame Problem”Problem', Philosophical Psychology, vol. 14(2), pp. 141–153.

* Willard, Charles Arthur ''Liberalism and the Social Grounds of Knowledge'' Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

== Collegamenti esterni ==