Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Gzornenplatz (talk | contribs) restore deletion by Fred Bauder (I'm the one who made the request so I can comment), deleting Snowspinner's comment instead (uninvolved party) |
Jdforrester (talk | contribs) →[[User:VeryVerily|VeryVerily]]: Reinstate Snowspiiner's deleted comment. |
||
Line 34:
----
I'd like to note that I don't think VV's conduct can be reasonably looked at without looking at the larger issue of his treatment by the community at large, and, specifically, by people who are supposed to be in the position of settling disputes. I refer here to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/172&diff=3681033&oldid=3681018], which I think probably had the effect of making both requests for comment and mediation ineffective options for VeryVerily. I'm not asking for sanction against Danny (Or against Mirv or Hephestos, both of whom later signed this summary), but I think that this action and the consequences it probably had for dispute resolution with VV need to be taken into account. [[User:Snowspinner|Snowspinner]] 16:45, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)
I also request that user [[User:VeryVerily|VeryVerily]] be examined by the arbitration committee. I am particularly concerned with the user's conduct on the [[George W. Bush|George W. Bush page]]. [[User:Kevin baas|Kevin Baas]] | [[User_talk:Kevin_baas|talk]] 19:51, 2004 Aug 20 (UTC)
| |||