Revision as of 20:20, 21 February 2013 edit Ylloh (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 913 edits →Merged Walsh–Hadamard code into Hadamard code: added references ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:40, 21 February 2013 edit undo Deltahedron (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 7,714 edits →Merged Walsh–Hadamard code into Hadamard code: So the short answer to the question is ''No'' Next edit →
Line 53: }} ::call it Walsh code or Walsh family. They note that the "Walsh family can be interpreted as a subcode of the first-order Reed-Muller code". If you study these references, you will see that the definitions match the "Hadamard code" or the "punctured Hadamard code". Sorry I don't have a better answer, but I do believe that there should only be a single article on this object. [[User:Ylloh\|ylloh]] ([[User talk:Ylloh\|talk]]) 20:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC) :::So the short answer to the question is ''No''. In future please wait for a consensus of informed editors before following your own [[WP:OR\|personal research]]. [[User:Deltahedron\|Deltahedron]] ([[User talk:Deltahedron\|talk]]) 22:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Hadamard code: Difference between revisions