Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Education Program extension: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Next steps: reply |
→don't get why rfc?: new section |
||
Line 45:
::As I have said at [[User_talk:Sage_Ross_(WMF)#closure]], I think your closure was both inappropriate and wrong. But if WMF is going to proceed and not address the issues above, I'll leave it at that and hope I don't get to say I told you so. <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 23:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
:::I've undone the closure so that someone else can close it. We're going to get the configuration all set up and ready to enable. If the formal closure is somehow drastically different, I suppose we can step back and rethink how to proceed before it gets turned on. (Repeating from my talk page...) The main purpose of the RfC was to make sure we weren't turning this on against broad community opposition. Although the low participation is probably an indication that most people don't care much about it (understandable to an extent, since it won't affect much for those who aren't working with classes or monitoring student activity), there's clearly not much opposition to turning it on. As for the configuration, the middle option seems clearly the one that is acceptable to the most people (no explicit opposition to that choice, and the most support). I would have like a much more active RfC, but given that the discussion more or less ended three weeks ago, I didn't see any reason not to archive it. But since John has objected, I'm happy to have someone else close it formally.--[[User:Sage Ross (WMF)|Sage Ross (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sage Ross (WMF)|talk]]) 00:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
== don't get why rfc? ==
why not just roll it out. try things.
| |||