Coding gain: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Guanxs (talk | contribs)
Line 8:
In the ''power-limited regime'' (where the nominal [[spectral efficiency]] <math>\rho \le 2</math> [b/2D or b/s/Hz], ''i.e.'' the ___domain of binary signaling), the effective coding gain <math>\gamma_{eff}(A)</math> of a signal set <math>A</math> at a given target error probability per bit <math>P_b(E)</math> is defined as the difference in dB between the <math>E_b/N_0</math> required to achieve the target <math>P_b(E)</math> with <math>A</math> and the <math>E_b/N_0</math> required to achieve the target <math>P_b(E)</math> with 2-[[Pulse-amplitude modulation|PAM]] or (2&times;2)-[[Quadrature amplitude modulation|QAM]] (''i.e.'' no coding). The nominal coding gain <math>\gamma_c(A)</math> is defined as
 
: <math>\gamma_c(A) = {d^2_\{min}(A) \over 4E_b}.</math>
 
This definition is normalized so that <math>\gamma_c(A) = 1</math> for 2-PAM or (2&times;2)-QAM. If the average number of nearest neighbors per transmitted bit <math>K_b(A)</math> is equal to one, the effective coding gain <math>\gamma_{eff}(A)</math> is approximately equal to the nominal coding gain <math>\gamma_c(A)</math>. However, if <math>K_b(A)>1</math>, the effective coding gain <math>\gamma_{eff}(A)</math> is less than the nominal coding gain <math>\gamma_c(A)</math> by an amount which depends on the steepness of the <math>P_b(E)</math> ''vs.'' <math>E_b/N_0</math> curve at the target <math>P_b(E)</math>. This curve can be plotted using the [[union bound]] estimate (UBE)