Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of physics articles (!$@): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Mark viking (talk | contribs) →Index of physics articles (!$@): Keep, unclear what the grounds are for deletion for this specific set of index articles. |
|||
Line 39:
* I can see the merit of '''keep'''ing these. Which is, it's good and useful to have a flat index ''as well'' as a nested-Lord-knows-how-many-deep hierarchy. Let's not declare it un-maintainable unless we've shown that nobody is maintaining them. [[User:Collard|Lewis Collard!]] <small>([[User talk:Collard|lol]], [[commons:User:Collard|internet]]) </small> 18:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
* '''Keep All''' - While I wouldn't advocate anyone commit the massive amount of time necessary to create and maintain such an apparatus, it is clear that this is very well done and fulfills a valid navigational function, which is the key thing. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 21:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' or possibly meld into one [[Index of physics articles]] article. Indices of science-related articles on Wikipedia are numerous; [[:Category:Indexes_of_science_articles]] lists 37 of them. Why pick on physics? If it is because the index is broken into separate articles, we could meld them into one. If it is not the physics index articles in particular, but indices in general that you think are useless, then this is something to bring up on a policy forum, not AfD. As a side note, there is no AfD notice on the 'A' page. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 22:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
| |||