Revision as of 07:07, 9 March 2013 edit Jclemens (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 46,125 edits →Index of physics articles (!$@): k ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:16, 9 March 2013 edit undo Colonel Warden (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 31,042 edits →Index of physics articles (!$@): absurd Next edit →
Line 44: :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Lists\|list of Lists-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k\|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k\|talk]]) 00:08, 9 March 2013 (UTC)</small> '''Keep all''' Passes [[WP:CLN]], no policy-based reason for deletion has been advanced, since "redundant to category" is both a) not a policy-based reason, and b) not true--list articles maintain past revisions of their content in history, categories do not. [[User:Jclemens\|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens\|talk]]) 07:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC) '''Keep''' The nomination is absurd because lists may be hierarchical and these examples form a simple hierarchy with the main [[Index of physics articles]] being the parent. [[User:Colonel Warden\|Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden\|talk]]) 12:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of physics articles (!$@): Difference between revisions