Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of physics articles (!$@): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Index of physics articles (!$@): comment |
Praemonitus (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 54:
* '''Keep''' – The point of the {{tl|orphan}} template appears to be to promote Wikipedia interconnectivity. An index like this is one way to interconnect articles by subject matter; some of which may otherwise be orphans. Hence, I think this index should be retained in some form. [[User:Praemonitus|Praemonitus]] ([[User talk:Praemonitus|talk]]) 22:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
**That is what categories are for. No need to keep redundant lists just so articles aren't orphaned. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|'''<small><sup>DON'T PANIC</sup></small>''']] 23:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
*** Categories are not counted in the link tally. Thus they are not useful for the purpose I stated. [[User:Praemonitus|Praemonitus]] ([[User talk:Praemonitus|talk]]) 02:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' all per gorgan_almighty. This is what Categories are for. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|'''<small><sup>DON'T PANIC</sup></small>''']] 23:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
::As explained further above, and in the already mentioned [[WP:CLN]], categories and indices are ''not'' the same. We should keep these index pages until we have another solution providing the same functionality. — [[User:Hhhippo|<font color="darkblue" face="times">'''H<small>HHIPPO</small>'''</font>]] 18:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
| |||