Revision as of 04:12, 18 March 2013 edit Beland (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 259,163 edits →Key questions: {{incomplete}} ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:14, 18 March 2013 edit undo Beland (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 259,163 edits →Suggested sources for expansion: new section Next edit →
Line 59: I would say the only reasonable answer to these questions is "no" -- otherwise we will need to include every modern database engine under the sun, which defeats the purpose of the "in-memory database" distinction. -- [[user:intgr\|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr\|[talk]]]</small> 10:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC) == Suggested sources for expansion == I found the below commented-out in the "External links" section. -- [[User:Beland\|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland\|talk]]) 04:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC) ---- We need to put the info from these into the main article and format as cites * [http://db.cs.yale.edu/hstore/ H-store Project] * [http://martinfowler.com/bliki/InMemoryTestDatabase.html Martin Fowler wiki: InMemoryTestDatabase] * [http://www.inf.unisi.ch/projects/sprint Sprint Project] * Article "[http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=627538 Main Memory Database Systems: An Overview]" by [[Hector Garcia-Molina]] and [[Kenneth Salem]]

Talk:In-memory database: Difference between revisions