Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12:
You may also want to include an example while explaining the different positions of decoding to better clarify them. What you did in that section was explaining what the theory was, but can you apply it using a practical example?
Also, Hall presented some graphs and charts that easily explain his model, and since we belong to such a visual culture it might be a good idea to check out some graphics that summarize Hall's model. Internet users are likely to look at a chart and get the point immediately rather than read through too much writing. On the other, getting the copyrights to publish Hall's graphics might be a pain. [[User:Lavoile|Lavoile]] ([[User talk:Lavoile|talk]]) 14:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
The intro could probably be altered a little bit as it seems more like a subsection to Hall's page instead of its own article. With the examples (Hebdige and Morley), it would be good to explain how they utilized the method. In that case, it may also be good to move that section below the explanation of the different stages. I also changed the title on the Definition section which I think makes more sense unless there are other interpretations. What are some similar theories that could be linked to (either within the current article or in a "See Also" section)? This would give the article more credibility and act as a launch point for more info. You could also do the same with those articles, linking back here. Source-wise, the citations are good, maybe add some competing theories as contextual contrast?[[User:RyanG9114|RyanG9114]] ([[User talk:RyanG9114|talk]]) 01:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
| |||