Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchuminWeb: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:59, 29 March 2013

Revision as of 05:01, 29 March 2013

Line 147:

:* @ Davewild: while pending and suspend come originally from the same root, they are not synonyms. As far as the policy provision is concerned, it is sometimes helpful to look at the intention as well as the wording. The objective of the policy provision was to provide continuity during the transition from one year's committee to the next and and to prevent the disruption that would result from half of the committee changing in the middle of the workshop or midway through voting on an intricate proposed decision. Neither of those circumstances apply here ;) &nbsp;[[User:Roger Davies|<span style="color:maroon; font-variant:small-caps">'''Roger Davies'''</span>]] ^{[[User talk:Roger Davies|''talk'']]} 11:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

=Final decision (none yet) =

''All tallies are based the votes at [[/Proposed decision]], where comments and discussion from the voting phase is also available.''

==Principles==

<!-- uncomment/un-nowiki and fill in <nowiki>

===Template===

1) ...

:''Passed x to x at ~~~~~

</nowiki> -->

==Findings of fact==

<!-- uncomment/un-nowiki and fill in <nowiki>

===Template===

1) ...

:''Passed x to x at ~~~~~

</nowiki> -->

==Remedies==

''All remedies that refer to a period of time (for example, a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months) are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''

<!-- uncomment/un-nowiki and fill in <nowiki>

===Template===

1) ...

:''Passed x to x at ~~~~~

</nowiki> -->

==Enforcement==

<!-- uncomment/un-nowiki and fill in <nowiki>

===Template===

1) ...

:''Passed x to x at ~~~~~

</nowiki> -->

=== Enforcement by block ===