Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simple Declarative Language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Psychonaut (talk | contribs) →Simple Declarative Language: Did you say you were able to find three or four books specifically on SDL? |
Mark viking (talk | contribs) →Simple Declarative Language: Comment on multiple meanings of SDL |
||
Line 18:
*'''Delete''' There really is no solid information out there for SDL; the only thing you can find is mostly buzz. I was only able to find a few (3 or 4) books specifically on the subject and not just referenced as part of a known programming language (C++, .NET, etc.). I am with Mark on this one, this does not meet notability standards to remain. --[[User:Karverstudio|Karverstudio]] ([[User talk:Karverstudio|talk]]) 17:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
**I'm sorry, did you say you were able to find three or four books specifically on SDL? If so, then it should easily pass our notability requirements. Could you list the books here or in the article? —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 19:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
** I will happily change my recommendation if there are such sources. We need to be a little careful, however, because SDL is an overloaded acronym. There is a much more popular SDL in the form of [[Simple DirectMedia Layer]] and there are books written on this, e.g., the list at the [http://wiki.libsdl.org/moin.fcg/Books SDL wiki]. But I haven't seen any books for the simple declarative language. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 21:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
| |||