Revision as of 20:31, 14 April 2013 edit TonyTheTiger (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 404,647 edits →GA Review: FAIL ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:32, 14 April 2013 edit undo TonyTheTiger (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 404,647 edits →GA Review: ce Next edit →
Line 27: Most of this section is unsourced, leaving the reader to question the veracity of the claim and to wonder if these were selected from a much larger list of examples.--[[User:TonyTheTiger\|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger\|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger\|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon\|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 20:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC) I am going to '''FAIL''' this article. There are too many subsections that are entirely unsourced. I am so far removed from my Masters in Stats that I keep looking ~~four~~for references that are not there. Any reader who wants to read this article will be at a loss to [[WP:V]] many important elements of the article.--[[User:TonyTheTiger\|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger\|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger\|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon\|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 20:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Fibonacci sequence/GA1: Difference between revisions