User:Aaron Schulz/History analysis JS Definitions and FAQ: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Aaron Schulz (talk | contribs) |
Aaron Schulz (talk | contribs) m →Minor: gr |
||
Line 3:
This is any edit that is '''not''' a revert and is a)marked as minor, b)keyword identified as minor and '''not''' a revert, or c)any article edit with too short of a summary that does not have certain keywords. For example, a summary of "(add link)" (8 letters) to an article will be counted as minor, though a summary of "(expanded)" (8 too) will not be counted as minor unless it was marked by the user as minor. Not that "8" is not the cuttoff number. One word ''article'' edits that are not reckognized key words for significant edits will count as minor as well.
When calculating edit summary usage, it only looks at how ''the user'' marked and it whether there was a summary or not.
Minor edits to talk pages are whatever the user marks as minor, minus reverts. Other, non-article edits pass keyword checks and may be counted as major. Articles edits pass word count, keyword, and character count checks; article edit summaries are analyized with the most vigor.
| |||