Revision as of 19:10, 24 April 2013 edit NateJonesAR (talk \| contribs) 54 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:27, 24 April 2013 edit undo NateJonesAR (talk \| contribs) 54 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 78: There are three figures below illustrating the “steady flow” HEC-RAS results. The first figure is a graphical output directly from HEC-RAS, showing the surface water profile of the modeled reach. The next two figures are comparing the surface water profiles developed by HEC-RAS and the STM calculation method. There is good agreement between HEC-RAS and the STM method, except for the M3 profile just downstream of the sluice gate. While HEC-RAS can model both subcritical and supercritical flows within the same reach, the did not produce an M3 Profile in this instance. <br /><br /> [[File:HEC-RAS Output.jpg\|HEC-RAS Output]] [[File:Tabularcomparison.jpg\|Tabularcomparison]]

Standard step method: Difference between revisions