Content deleted Content added
tidied discussion |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7:
*'''Oppose''' - I agree. The terms are not at all interchangeable and neither term has a single definition. Phil Graham
*'''Opposing Merger''' - Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a complex theory and model that has interpretations of texts and languages that go beyond the study of discourse analysis, and exceed the scope of many schools of thought on the interpretation of discourse. <p> CDA should remain independant from Discourse Analysis (DA) due to its innovative and complex nature. Whilst similar, the studies achieve different results when applied, and thus CDA and DA should remain apart, and more people should focus on the addition of Critical Linguistics (CL) as a conterpoint to CDA and as a resource for those interested in Discourse Analysis. The combination of CDA, DA, and CL would improve the understanding of the masses and no one would have even suggested such a merger be allowed. <p>Adam Moreland
==CDA and Discourse Analysis==
What diferentiates CDA from plain and simple DA? I think the article should make that clear. [[User:201.37.176.252|201.37.176.252]] 14:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
| |||