Revision as of 09:18, 17 April 2013 edit Intgr (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 32,266 edits →Neutral point of view issues: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:30, 30 April 2013 edit undo Music Sorter (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,339 edits →Neutral point of view issues: propose an outline? Next edit →
Line 44: ::Agreed. The real problem with hardware encryption is that it's difficult to verify the crypto implementation (for backdoors and other weaknesses) and manufacturers have a track record of getting it wrong. Some relevant sources: [http://www.h-online.com/security/features/Enclosed-but-not-encrypted-746199.html] [http://www1.cs.fau.de/sed] [https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/09/the_doghouse_xo.html] [https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/09/the_doghouse_to.html] [https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/02/the_doghouse_dr.html] -- [[user:intgr\|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr\|[talk]]]</small> 09:18, 17 April 2013 (UTC) :::Anyone want to propose an alternate outline that we can start from with both sides covered? [[user:Music Sorter\|'''<span style="font-family:veranda,sans-serif;background:lightblue;color:Blue">§ Music Sorter §</span>''']] ([[User talk:Music Sorter#top\|talk]]) 18:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Hardware-based full disk encryption: Difference between revisions