Content deleted Content added
Arthur Rubin is a stalker. Never mind that e is transcendental; it could not be more obvious that it has a homology. Does someone have time to write up why the natural interpretation of a^p^x is not helpful? |
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) Reverted 1 edit by 64.134.229.15 (talk): Does anyone see how "double exponential" _is_ relevant, and calculators should not be here. (TW) |
||
Line 30:
Another major difference to the situation in '''C''' is that the ___domain of convergence of exp<sub>''p''</sub> is much smaller than that of log<sub>''p''</sub>. A modified exponential function — the [[Artin–Hasse exponential]] — can be used instead which converges on |''z''|<sub>''p''</sub> < 1.
==Notes==
Line 56 ⟶ 53:
==External links==
* {{planetmath reference|id=7000|title=p-adic exponential and p-adic logarithm}}
[[Category:Exponentials]]
| |||