Revision as of 22:55, 30 April 2013 edit DePiep (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 294,285 edits →Unexpected redlink: conclusion ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:55, 30 April 2013 edit undo DePiep (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 294,285 edits →Caption font color: new section Next edit →
Line 22: ::::::You are right. It is even worse. It uses the <code>darkred</code> color, against [[WP:COLOR]]. :::::::This is a (secundary) reason to revert using font-color in the caption. See below: [[#Caption font color]] -[[User:DePiep\|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep\|talk]]) 22:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC) == Caption font color == I have undone the coloring of the ''caption font color''. First of all, Unicoded does not have a "script type", so we are entering OR. Secondary, it uses color ''without meaning''. The reader can not see the meaning (it is not even elsewhere, as in a key/legend). Third, one color was ''red'', which suggested a redlink. -[[User:DePiep\|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep\|talk]]) 22:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox Unicode block: Difference between revisions