Revision as of 01:04, 9 January 2013 edit Yahya Abdal-Aziz (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,971 edits →The 'Editor features' table is too wide: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:50, 6 May 2013 edit undo 188.223.226.195 (talk) →Which Editors run in Java/Javascript/zero-install/non-admin install: new section Next edit →
Line 187: [[User:Yahya Abdal-Aziz\|yoyo]] ([[User talk:Yahya Abdal-Aziz\|talk]]) 01:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC) == Which Editors run in Java/Javascript/zero-install/non-admin install == The tables could helpfully document which editors are build/run in Java (JRE), Javascript, or are otherwise likely to be "non admin install" if running on a locked down computer (assuming a java/javascript enabled browser browser is installed, or Java Webstart is installed). Zero-admin means that the programme doesn't need to create registry entries, register DLLs, need to put any files in program files, windows/system or windows/system32 etc. and is available unbundled from an installer or can be unbundled by zipping up files of a working install where all the files are easy to find. (Good no-admin install text editor examples are notepad++ and PFE.) I know that some of the editors listed are JavaScript, and maybe Java. The [[comparison of text editors]] does show ones developed in Java, for example. --[[Special:Contributions/188.223.226.195\|188.223.226.195]] ([[User talk:188.223.226.195\|talk]]) 11:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Comparison of HTML editors: Difference between revisions